Attempt 1 · too broad

> is this deck good?

Attempt 2 · invite the attack

> Which slide is weakest? Steelman the criticism.

Then: what would a skeptical program officer ask me
in the Q&A after slide 3?

Attempt 3 · verify a number

> Pick one claim or stat in the deck that can't survive
a fact-check. Help me verify it in primary sources —
cite a specific URL I can open right now.

Attempt 4 · rewrite in options

> Rewrite the weakest slide three ways:
  (a) tighter and quieter
  (b) punchier and more urgent
  (c) data-leading (stat first, claim second)